A software bill of materials (SBOM) is a complete inventory of components, including metadata such as licenses and versions, that make up a software application. SBOMs provide organizations with a centralized and complete record of details on third-party components, open-source libraries, and software dependencies used in the development of a software application.
Proving a vital element to software security and software supply chain risk management, SBOMs enable organizations to assess risks within third-party and proprietary software packages and resources.
A software bill of materials (SBOM) is an inventory of all the components — including third-party libraries, artifacts, licenses, scripts, and package versions, as well as dependencies that make up a software application.
As an ingredient list, the SBOM provides transparency into all constituent parts of the software. By documenting every component, from the primary application down to the smallest library, SBOMs offer a clear view into what's running in an environment, ultimately enabling security teams to understand risk, track dependencies, and audit software.
In the context of cloud-native applications, SBOMs play a pivotal role. Microservices architectures, by design, break applications into smaller, independent services. Many of these services often incorporate open-source software packages. In fact, a single OSS package could be propagated across multiple services, potentially thousands of times. Without proper awareness of these components, developers and security teams can overlook vulnerabilities. SBOMs address the challenge by offering a consolidated view of all software ingredients — in-house and third-party.
The primary benefit of SBOMs lies in the rapid response to emerging vulnerabilities they facilitate. When a vulnerability emerges in an open-source package, for instance, an organization with a detailed SBOM can quickly assess their exposure and act accordingly. In the absence of an SBOM, identifying affected areas across the software supply chain might take days or weeks, leaving applications vulnerable to potential attacks.
Every organization engaged in software development, procurement, or deployment should maintain a software bill of materials to enhance security, risk management, and compliance practices.
What’s more, given the pivotal role the SBOM plays in vulnerability management, all stakeholders directly involved with application development processes should be equipped with a comprehensive SBOM.
Developers can use SBOMs to track dependencies, manage open-source components, and ensure that the libraries and frameworks they utilize are up-to-date and secure. An SBOM helps developers identify potential vulnerabilities and prioritize remediation efforts during the development process.
By providing an inventory of software components, an SBOM enables operations and DevOps teams to manage software deployments, monitor for updates and patches, and maintain a secure environment during continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes.
An SBOM aids security teams in vulnerability management, risk assessment, and incident response. It enables them to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in the software stack, determine the scope and impact of security incidents, and plan recovery efforts more efficiently.
SBOMs facilitate compliance with industry regulations and standards by providing transparency into the software supply chain. Compliance officers and auditors can use SBOMs to verify that organizations adhere to best practices and regulatory requirements related to software components, third-party libraries, and open-source usage.
Software vendors and suppliers can leverage SBOMs to demonstrate the security and reliability of their products, providing customers with increased confidence in their offerings. An SBOM helps vendors showcase their adherence to industry standards and best practices, which can be a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Customers and end-users benefit from SBOMs by gaining insight into the software components they rely on, making informed decisions about the software they procure, and ensuring that they maintain a secure and compliant environment.
A software bill of materials typically includes the following for each component of your software application:
In 2021, the White House explicitly highlighted software bills of materials in the Executive Order on Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity, emphasizing their importance for managing software security and risk. The order mandates that all U.S. government agencies receive an SBOM for software purchased from vendors.
Various agencies have taken steps to support organizations adopting SBOMs. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) developed a framework for creating SBOMs, while the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued guidelines for using SBOMs to manage software risk. Other organizations and initiatives, such as the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) and the Linux Foundation, also promote SBOMs as a best practice for software supply chain risk management.
"By 2025, 60% of organizations building or procuring critical infrastructure software will mandate and standardize software bills of materials (SBOMs) in their software engineering practice, up from less than 20% in 2022," according to Gartner Hype Cycle for Open-Source Software.
In the above-mentioned Gartner Hype Cycle for Open-Source Software, the data market research firm defined software bill of materials as “the evolutionary response to the demand for transparency and control of third-party, software-related risks.” In other words, widespread OSS adoption has resulted, by necessity, in widespread SBOM adoption.
To maintain a competitive release velocity, organizations prioritize agility and leverage technologies to improve application development efficiency — including third-party components such as open-source code. But because third-party components introduce unique risks and additional complexity into the software supply chain, organizations build SBOMs into their software supply chain security strategies.
SBOMs provide critical visibility into the software supply chain. With a detailed list of all software components — including relevant metadata like open-source licenses and package versions — organizations fully understand all the components that constitute their software.
Providing visibility into the software components used within an organization, the SBOM supports risk assessment and mitigation efforts and contributes to maintaining a secure and compliant software environment. SBOMs help identify vulnerabilities in software applications by surfacing information about third-party libraries and dependencies. This information enables teams to make data-informed decisions about how to best manage their use of software components to align their supply chain strategy with their overall risk tolerance.
An SBOM facilitates compliance with industry regulations and standards, as it provides transparency into the software supply chain and allows for traceability in the event of a security breach or audit.
Organizations can use SBOMs to get visibility into their open-source software use, which enables teams to proactively identify any relevant open-source package licenses. If a team accidentally uses an open-source package in a noncompliant manner and does not catch it early, that can result in significant remediation costs down the line. But early identification of OSS license noncompliance enables development teams to quickly remediate the issue and avoid the time-intensive process of retroactively removing noncompliant packages from their codebase.
A software bill of materials enables software developers, IT security teams, and other stakeholders to make informed decisions about security risks and compliance, in addition to software development and deployment. Other benefits include:
With a well-maintained SBOM, organizations can efficiently prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities, focusing on those that pose the highest risk to their systems and applications. Security teams can use the information in an SBOM to conduct vulnerability assessments on software components and dependencies. These assessments help teams identify vulnerabilities and better prioritize remediation efforts. Similarly, with improved visibility into their software supply chain, organizations can identify and manage supply chain risks, including those related to open-source software dependencies and CI/CD pipelines.
What’s more, an SBOM assists in streamlining patch management by pinpointing affected components when security updates are released, enabling organizations to apply patches quickly and minimize the window of exposure.
A SBOM supports incident response efforts by helping security teams identify compromised components and understand the potential impact of a breach.
By providing incident responders with visibility into the software stack, offering detailed information about the components within an application or system, security teams can quickly identify not only the affected software components but also their versions, and dependencies. Having this information in hand accelerates the process of determining the scope and impact of the breach, in addition to facilitating a more targeted response.
Knowledge is power. With a clear inventory of software components and their relationships, responders understand the attack vectors that adversaries may have exploited and can discover the root cause of the breach. When the incident originates from a vulnerable component, the SBOM allows security teams to trace the component's origin in the supply chain.
With a comprehensive understanding of the affected components, incident response teams can better plan and execute recovery efforts. The SBOM enables teams to prioritize remediation, apply patches, and restore systems to a secure state more efficiently, minimizing downtime and disruption.
In the aftermath of a security incident, forensic investigators can use the SBOM to reconstruct the sequence of events, identify potential vulnerabilities, and determine the extent of the compromise. A SBOM-guided analysis is invaluable for improving security measures, refining incident response plans, and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
SBOMs help organizations better manage and maintain their software applications. By providing a clear list of all software components and their versions, organizations can more easily identify and manage updates and patches to ensure that software applications are up to date and protected.
SBOMs are important because they help organizations better manage security, compliance, visibility, maintenance, and the risks associated with third-party software components. By providing organizations with granular visibility into all components that make up their codebase, they can make more informed decisions about their software supply chain security posture and risk tolerance.
Related article: Ungoverned Usage of Third-Party Services in the CI/CD Pipeline
Software composition analysis (SCA) and software bill of materials play complementary roles in ensuring the security and transparency of applications in the software development process.
SCA actively scans and analyzes the components in an application, particularly open-source and third-party components, to identify known vulnerabilities and potential licensing issues. By continuously monitoring for vulnerabilities in these components, software composition analysis helps developers make informed decisions about the components they use and provides actionable insights to remediate any issues found.
The SBOM serves as a transparent record of the application's composition, enabling developers to track dependencies and assess the impact of potential vulnerabilities or licensing issues.
When software composition analysis and SBOMs work together, they create a powerful synergy for securing and maintaining applications. Software composition analysis generates the data needed to populate the SBOM, and the SBOM, in turn, provides a clear and organized view of the application's components. Together, the two functionalities facilitate efficient vulnerability management, as developers can easily trace the origin of any security issue and prioritize remediation efforts based on the SBOM.
Bad actors often exploit vulnerabilities in open-source code components to infiltrate organizations' software supply chains. To avoid breaches and secure their software supply chains, organizations must identify and address potential risks. An SBOM generation tool offers visibility into the software supply chain, but organizations also need to detect and remediate vulnerabilities in open-source code to prevent OSS-based attacks.
Software composition analysis enables teams to scan their codebase for known vulnerabilities in open-source packages. If the SCA solution detects vulnerable packages, teams can swiftly apply patches or update to more secure versions. When no patch is available for a new vulnerability, organizations can use the SCA tool to locate the package's usage in their codebase, allowing engineers to remove and replace it.
Combining software composition analysis with an SBOM generation tool enhances visibility into the codebase and strengthens control over the software supply chain. This integrated approach empowers development and security teams to prevent open-source supply chain attacks and bolster their overall security posture.
In addition to helping prevent a cyberattack, an SBOM serves as a pivotal asset during a cyberattack. Security teams can leverage the SBOM to quickly identify affected components and assess the potential impact of the attack on the application. By pinpointing vulnerable components and understanding their dependencies, teams can prioritize remediation efforts and efficiently address security issues.
The lack of a universally accepted standard format for SBOMs can hinder interoperability between different tools and systems. Organizations must choose or adopt a suitable SBOM format that aligns with their needs and industry best practices while ensuring compatibility with their existing processes and tools.
Common SBOM formats include CycloneDX, CSV, and SPDX.
CycloneDX: CycloneDX is an open standard format for describing software bill of materials data. CycloneDX is a recommended SBOM format because it’s supported across a number of tools and platforms, such as OWASP Dependency-Track, GitHub, GitLab, and JFrog Xray.
CSV: A CSV file is a comma-separated SBOM format that displays SBOM data grouped by component type such as open-source packages and container images.
SPDX: The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) format is a widely used open standard format that’s maintained by the Linux Foundation.
Using an open standard format for your software bill of materials, such as CycloneDX or SPDX, can help facilitate interoperability across tools and platforms.
Organizations can also use Software Identification (SWID) tags as a form of SBOM. While SWID tags are not a distinct format of SBOM, they can be used to produce the same kinds of information that more traditional SBOM formats display. For example, organizations can use SWID tags to describe a wide range of components, including operating systems, applications, and libraries.
Creating and maintaining a SBOM presents challenges. To manage the complexity and scale of software components — including open-source libraries, third-party tools, and proprietary code — requires significant effort.
SBOMs must be comprehensive, which can prove challenging when tracking an inventory across diverse environments. Along similar lines, SBOMs could lack sufficient depth of information about the extent of potential damage or exploitability of identified vulnerabilities. In some circumstances, DevSecOps teams will need to supplement SBOMs with additional vulnerability assessment and risk analysis techniques.
Automated SBOM generation tools may produce false positives, inaccurately flagging components as vulnerable or including components not present in the production environment. Organizations need to verify the accuracy of generated SBOMs and filter out any irrelevant or incorrect information, which may cause fatigue.
Software components are frequently updated, with new versions introducing bug fixes, security patches, or additional features. Maintaining an SBOM requires continuous monitoring and updating to reflect these changes and ensure that the most recent and secure versions of components are documented.
SBOMs may contain sensitive information about an organization's software stack and its potential vulnerabilities. Safeguarding this data and ensuring that access to it is restricted to authorized personnel is essential to prevent unintended disclosure of sensitive information.
While automated tools can help streamline the process of generating and maintaining an SBOM, integrating these tools into existing development and deployment pipelines may present challenges. Organizations must ensure compatibility with their existing toolsets, workflows, infrastructure, and security policies.
When adopting an SBOM generation solution, organizations need to establish a set of best practices to ensure that they’re fully benefiting from the visibility, security, and compliance benefits of SBOMs. Organizations should ensure that their SBOM strategy incorporates the following best practices:
Whenever proprietary software has a new release, a supplier shares new information about a component, or another stakeholder identifies an error in the SBOM, the organization must generate a new SBOM.
At minimum, an SBOM must inventory all the main software components and list transitive dependencies. However, it’s recommended to seek an SBOM generation solution that goes into deeper layers of dependencies to provide comprehensive visibility into the software supply chain.
To find evidence of tampering, compare SBOMs generated before and after deployment. This practice helps provide the validity and reliability of information stored in an SBOM.
Assume that an SBOM does not represent the complete dependency graph, unless otherwise stated. SBOMs may have incomplete or inaccurate information and teams need to consider that fact as they work with SBOMs.
Procedures must be established to ensure that SBOMs are delivered to relevant stakeholders promptly and with proper permissions.
Some, but not all, organizations may be comfortable sharing SBOM information publicly. If organizations prefer to restrict access to data, they will need to establish access control procedures via licensing, contracts, or another mechanism with their stakeholders.
While it is not common for a single organization to actively use multiple SBOM formats for their internal processes, certain scenarios may require them to work with different formats. For example, when collaborating with external partners or suppliers in a software supply chain, an organization may encounter different SBOM formats used by these entities. In such cases, organizations may need to translate or convert between formats to ensure compatibility and maintain effective communication throughout the supply chain.
Selecting and adopting a single SBOM format internally that aligns with industry best practices and the organization's requirements can help streamline processes and reduce complexity.
