Firewalls represent a crucial piece of technology that monitors and filters incoming or outgoing internet traffic with the ultimate goal of protecting against threats and preventing sensitive data leaks. Businesses and organizations rely on these devices to work consistently and reliably so that they can secure critical resources for infiltration.
There are many kinds of firewalls available, and each type has its own functionality and purpose. In this article, we will compare web application firewalls (WAFs) and next-generation firewalls (NGFWs), and then explore ways to include them as part of a comprehensive security solution.
A web application firewall (WAF) is a type of firewall that understands a higher protocol level (HTTP or Layer 7) of incoming traffic between a web application and the internet. It is able to detect and respond to malicious requests before they are accepted by web applications and web servers, thus giving businesses an extra layer of security.
When using WAFs to protect web applications, you typically define rules that either allow, block or monitor web requests based on certain criteria. For example, you can specify a rule that you need to block all incoming requests from a particular IP or only requests that contain specific HTTP headers or vulnerabilities. If you just want to monitor traffic, you can set up monitors that count certain endpoints. This flexibility allows security administrators to quickly record what is being requested and block unauthorized or unwanted requests when incidents and compromises occur.
Due to the fact that WAFs understand a higher level of traffic, they are able to block web application attacks (among other benefits). Many of these attacks are closely related to the OWASP Top 10 list, including cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, SQL injection, denial-of-service (DoS), and the leakage of credentials or unsafe information.
A next-generation firewall (NGFW) is a type of application firewall that combines the best features of a traditional network firewall and a web application firewall. It typically acts as a firewall that blocks incoming requests by inspecting the network layer packets, but it also has additional inspection capabilities that unlock novel ways to block unwanted traffic on your private network.
Some of these capabilities relate to TLS inspection and termination, intrusion detection and prevention, threat intelligence, and the ability to configure advanced filtering rules based on the contents of the traffic or the URLs. The main benefit of this flexibility is that it allows security admins to handle more advanced scenarios and block more sophisticated threats that stem from coordinated attack vectors.
Now that you understand the fundamental concepts behind WAFs and NGFWs, we will explain their similarities and differences.
It’s fair to say that there is a bit of overlap between WAFs and NGFWs. They both employ rules and policy engines to filter incoming traffic and act based on certain criteria. Both are easier to run these days, and depending on the vendor offering, you won’t need to purchase dedicated hardware to enjoy those features.
You might think that they overlap because they both work on application-layer protocols – Layer 7 in particular. That’s true. You can think of NGFWs as extensions of traditional firewalls with the added ability to process traffic from OSI Layers 3-4 and 7 and leverage that information to take action before it reaches an inner layer closer to the application.
Their key differences lie in their core responsibility models and overall capabilities. NGFWs capture more network traffic context so that they can prevent incoming attacks before they reach the network layer. They can also combine threat intelligence engines to assist in the decision-making process. WAFs, on the other hand, are confined to the application layer, so they specialize in preventing common web-based attacks like XSS and SQL injections. WAFs cannot be used as primary firewalls for your network, but they are ideal to protect your web applications exposed to the internet.
You want to use web application firewalls (WAFs) for the following reasons:
Next-generation firewall (NGFW) solutions protect against both network- and application-wide attacks. Their key characteristics are:
Now that you have a fair idea of when to use a WAF versus a NGFW, let’s see how you can use them both to provide a comprehensive and in-depth defense solution.
Given that WAFs are dedicated to protecting web application traffic, they represent the ideal option for protecting web servers. WAFs are not the ultimate solution when it comes to comprehensive security, though, so it’s best if you can combine them with NGFWs.
The ideal holistic defense strategy is to have a WAF configured to protect against the OWASP Top 10 attacks with an NGFW acting as a traditional network firewall that is able to detect and prevent certain attacks before they reach the WAF. Using advanced capabilities like IDS/IPS and threat modeling, NGFWs can filter out a massive percentage of attacks and leave the rest for the WAFs to tackle.
When searching for a web application security solution, you should consider several factors. First, you need a trusted and reliable vendor that offers a holistic set of tools and services for protecting your web applications. Palo Alto Networks is one such vendor that offers a comprehensive and easy-to-use set of firewalls, including NGFWs and Web Application and API Security platform, which includes a built-in WAF.
Second, you need great documentation and excellent technical support. Developers and security admins rely on reference documentation so they can understand how to properly configure the firewalls that adhere to their security policies. Documentation needs to be up to date, accurate and easily accessible so any implementation of incoming requests can be done efficiently with minimal risk of misconfiguration. Palo Alto Networks docs site is a robust and easy-to-navigate developer documentation site with deep and detailed listings of the features, how to set them up, and version information for compatibility.
